Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

Costantino, N (2006) The contribution of Ranko Bon to the debate on sustainable construction. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 705-9.

Dietzenbacher, E and Hoen, A R (2006) Coefficient stability and predictability in input-output models: a comparative analysis for the Netherlands. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 671-80.

Dikmen, I and Birgonul, M T (2006) A review of international construction research: Ranko Bon's contribution. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 725-33.

Ganesan, S and Kelsey, J (2006) Technology transfer: international collaboration in Sri Lanka. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 743-53.

Hawk, D (2006) Conditions of Success: a platform for international construction development. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 735-42.

Mccann, P (2006) On the supply-side determinants of regional growth. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 681-93.

Pietroforte, R and Gregori, T (2006) Does volume follow share? The case of the Danish construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 711-5.

Ruddock, L and Lopes, J (2006) The construction sector and economic development: the "Bon curve". Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 717-23.

Shipworth, D (2006) Qualitative modelling of sustainable energy scenarios: an extension of the Bon qualitative input-output model. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 695-703.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Energy policy; input-output analysis; Bayesian belief networks; carbon management; sustainable consumption and production
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600658917
  • Abstract:

    Climate change is one of the major challenges facing economic systems at the start of the 21st century. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions will require both restructuring the energy supply system (production) and addressing the efficiency and sufficiency of the social uses of energy (consumption). The energy production system is a complicated supply network of interlinked sectors with ‘knock‐on’ effects throughout the economy. End use energy consumption is governed by complex sets of interdependent cultural, social, psychological and economic variables driven by shifts in consumer preference and technological development trajectories. To date, few models have been developed for exploring alternative joint energy production–consumption systems. The aim of this work is to propose one such model. This is achieved in a methodologically coherent manner through integration of qualitative input–output models of production, with Bayesian belief network models of consumption, at point of final demand. The resulting integrated framework can be applied either (relatively) quickly and qualitatively to explore alternative energy scenarios, or as a fully developed quantitative model to derive or assess specific energy policy options. The qualitative applications are explored here.

Skitmore, M, Runeson, G and Chang, X (2006) Construction price formation: full-cost pricing or neoclassical microeconomic theory?. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 773-83.

Steadman, P (2006) Allometry and built form: revisiting Ranko Bon's work with the Harvard Philomorphs. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 755-65.

Valence, G D (2006) Building as an economic process: the Austrian approach revisited. Construction Management and Economics, 24(07), 767-71.